Home » Posts tagged 'IPM'

Tag Archives: IPM

ABOUT ME

osunpk

osunpk

Since 2008 I have served as the Precision Nutrient Management Extension Specialist for Oklahoma State University. I work in Wheat, Corn, Sorghum, Cotton, Soybean, Canola, Sweet Sorghum, Sesame, Pasture/Hay. My work focuses on providing information and tools to producers that will lead to improved nutrient management practices and increased profitability of Oklahoma production agriculture

View Full Profile →

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,231 other subscribers

Check Your Wheat: Greenbugs Reported in Central Oklahoma

Ashleigh M. Faris
Cropping Systems Extension Entomologist
Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology
Oklahoma State University

Wheat producers in central Oklahoma are reporting the presence of the greenbug, Schizaphis graminum, in winter wheat fields. Greenbugs are one of the most important insect pests of wheat in the southern Great Plains and can occur from fall through spring. These aphids feed on plant sap and inject toxins into wheat plants, causing characteristic leaf discoloration and plant injury.

Early detection through field scouting is essential to determine whether populations are increasing and if an insecticide treatment is justified.

Greenbug Identification & Biology

Key identifying characteristics of greenbug (Figure 1):

  • Small aphids (~1/16 inch long)
  • Pale to lime-green body
  • Dark green stripe down the middle of the back
  • Dark tips on antennae and legs
  • Found in colonies on the underside of wheat leaves
Figure 1. Greenbug nymphs and adults on wheat leaf. Greenbugs are distinguishable from other aphids based on their lime green bodies, dark green stripe down back, dark antennae, and dark leg tips. Image courtesy of https://databases.nbair.res.in/.

Greenbugs reproduce rapidly under favorable conditions (between 55° F and 95° F) and often occur in patches within fields rather than evenly distributed populations. During periods of cool weather, the greenbug may increase to enormous numbers, due to the absence of natural enemies, which develop significantly slower compared to greenbugs at such temperatures. On the other hand, cold weather can also influence aphid populations. However, this latest cold snap is not enough to eliminate greenbugs. It takes average temperatures below 20° F for at least a week to kill a substantial number of greenbugs in wheat.

Greenbug Damage in Wheat

Greenbugs damage wheat in two ways, through direct feeding and injection of toxic saliva. Greenbugs may also transmit barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), which can further reduce yield potential.

Typical early symptoms include small, reddish or copper spots on leaves (Figure 2) and yellowing around feeding sites. Advanced infestations will result in leaves turning yellow or orange, dead leaf tissue, stunted plants, and expanding patches of dead wheat. Heavy infestations may kill seedlings and reduce tillering, particularly during drought stress.

Figure 2. Early damage to wheat caused by greenbugs appears as yellow to reddish, coppery spots. Image courtesy of Alton Sparks, Kansas State Extension.

How to Scout for Greenbugs

The Glance-N-Go™ sampling system developed by Oklahoma State University can help determine whether aphid populations exceed economic thresholds. Download the Greenbug Glance N’ Go Sampler app for your smartphone. You will then input the control cost ($/Acre), crop value ($/Acre), and the Spring sampling window. Use a zig-zag or W-pattern (Figure 3) to scout your field, checking undersides of leaves at three tillers per stop for greenbugs and brown mummies. Use the app to record the numbers of these insects and sample until the app tells you to stop sampling or tells you treat. As temperatures warm, continue to scout regularly as greenbug populations may build.

Figure 3. Scouting pattern for greenbug. Walk a W-pattern across the field and examine plants at multiple locations. Inspect the underside of leaves and base of tillers for aphids and beneficial insects. Image courtesy of A.M. Faris, Oklahoma State University Extension.

Scouting recommendations without the Greenbug Glance N’ Go Sampler app:

  1. Walk a W or zigzag pattern across the field.
  2. Examine 10–20 plants at each stop.
  3. Check:
    • Underside of leaves
    • Leaf midrib
    • Base of tillers
  4. Record:
    • Aphids per tiller
    • Presence of aphid mummies (Figure 4)
    • Beneficial insects

Beneficial Insects

Natural enemies frequently control aphid populations. While scouting for greenbug you should also look for lady beetles, lacewing larvae, hoverfly larvae, and parasitized aphids (“mummies”) (Figure 4). If beneficial insects are abundant, aphid populations may decline without insecticide treatment. Where there are one to two lady beetles (adults and larvae) per foot of row, or 15 to 20 percent of the greenbugs have been parasitized, control measures could be delayed until it is determined whether the greenbug population is continuing to increase.

Based on current wheat scouting, it appears that parasitoid numbers are low this 2026 season so continuing to scout for greenbug will be critical in responding to populations that go unchecked by beneficials.

Figure 4. Brown mummy amongst greenbugs. The brown, inflated insect in the top let of the image is a greenbug that has been parasitized. Look for these mummies when making management decisions. Image courtesy of David Voegtlin, University of Illinois.

Economic Threshold Guidelines

The simplest way to determine if action needs to be taken against greenbugs is to utilize the Glance-N-Go™ sampling system developed by Oklahoma State University. Approximate guidelines historically used in Oklahoma wheat can be found in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Approximate guidelines historically used in Oklahoma wheat for greenbug.

Thresholds are influenced by:

  • Wheat growth stage
  • Crop value
  • Cost of treatment
  • Presence of beneficial insects

Insecticides Labeled for Greenbugs in Wheat

Aphid feeding and insecticide performance are strongly influenced by temperature. Greenbugs tend to move higher on wheat plants during warm conditions but may move lower on the plant or below ground during cold weather, reducing exposure to insecticides. As a result, damaging populations are most often observed in late winter and early spring. Insecticides generally perform best when temperatures are above 50°F, and control may occur more slowly in cooler conditions (e.g., control at 45° F may take roughly twice as long as at 70° F). If applications must be made under cooler temperatures, use the highest labeled rate. Wheat grown under irrigation can typically tolerate higher greenbug populations than dryland wheat.

Table 2. Common foliar options for greenbug in winter wheat.

Always follow pesticide label directions, application sites, and rates. Be sure to read and follow the label for preharvest intervals (PHI) and restricted-entry intervals (REI). Use a minimum of 10 GPA by ground and 3 GPA by air (if labelled for aerial application) to ensure adequate coverage.

For assistance with aphid identification or treatment decisions, see OSU Fact Sheet EPP-7099 Small Grain Aphids in Oklahoma and Their Management, or contact your local OSU Extension office.

Cropping Systems Extension Entomologist Dr. Ashleigh Faris.

Cotton disease update: Reniform nematode – 08/25/2025

Maíra Duffeck, OSU Row Crops Extension Pathologist, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Oklahoma State University
Maxwell Smith, OSU IPM for Cotton Extension Specialist, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Oklahoma State University
Jenny Dudak, OSU Extension Cotton Specialist, Department of Plant & Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University

Reniform nematode continues to be detected in cotton fields across Oklahoma. During the 2023 and 2024 growing seasons, a survey was conducted in 17 commercial cotton fields located in Tillman, Jackson, Grady, and Caddo counties to assess the presence of parasitic nematodes affecting cotton production. We collected soil samples in areas of the fields showing irregular and stunted cotton plants.

 Out of the 17 soil samples collected, reniform nematode was detected in 5 fields, marking the first confirmed report of this pest in Oklahoma cotton. Notably, in one of the positive fields, the reniform nematode population reached 1,569 nematodes per 100 cm³ of soil; more than double the economic threshold of 700 nematodes per 100 cm³. In 2025, a soil sample from a cotton field in Jackson County already tested positive for the reniform nematode. 

The reniform nematode, caused by Rotylenchulus reniformis, is one of the most important yield-limiting pathogens of cotton production in the southern U.S. In addition to cotton, the reniform nematode can reproduce on other field crops such as soybean, with yield loss estimates being greater in cotton than soybean. The reniform nematode is easy to introduce into new fields because of its unique ability to survive in a dehydrated state in dry soils. Therefore, it can be transported long distances on field equipment.

We suspect that parasitic nematodes, such as root-knot and reniform nematodes, are already present in many Oklahoma cotton fields, but the damage they cause often goes unnoticed. This is especially important for the reniform nematode, as yield losses can occur without obvious aboveground symptoms. For this reason, monitoring the distribution of this nematode across the cotton fields in Oklahoma is crucial to raise awareness of this emerging issue and to guide future management decisions.

Symptoms and Signs

The expression of symptoms depends on several factors, including the susceptibility of the cotton hybrid, nematode population levels, soil type, and for how long that field has been infested. Affected plants may show reduced growth, delayed flowering, fewer fruits, and smaller fruit size, which together contribute to yield losses in lint or pods. Unlike the southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita), the reniform nematode does not induce gall formation on roots, making field diagnosis based solely on visible symptoms challenging. For this reason, soil testing through a nematode assay is often necessary for proper identification. In newly infested fields, stunted plants are typically the most noticeable sign (Figure 1).

Plan of Action

To address this issue, a statewide nematode survey is underway to document the presence, abundance, and geographic distribution of parasitic nematodes in Oklahoma cotton fields. The information generated from this survey will provide a foundation for developing and implementing economically viable strategies to manage this issue and protect cotton production in the state.

How to participate?

Oklahoma cotton growers interested in having their fields tested for parasitic nematodes have several ways to participate in this study:

  1. Schedule a field visit: Contact Dr. Maira Duffeck to arrange soil sample collection. She can be reached by phone at 347-205-2180 or by email at mairodr@okstate.edu.
  2. Drop off samples at the Peanut & Cotton Field Day: September 18, 2025, from 5:00–8:00 p.m. at the Caddo Research Station (28054 County Street 2540, Ft. Cobb)
  3. Drop off samples at the Cotton Field Day: September 25, 2025, from 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Southwest Research & Extension Center (16721 US Hwy 283, Altus)

More information about dropping off samples on OSU field days can be found on the flyers shown in Figures 2 and 3. Growers can submit soil samples for analysis at no cost, as expenses are covered through a project funded by the Oklahoma Cotton Council in partnership with Cotton Incorporated.

How to collect soil samples for analysis?

  • Soil samples should be collected from the root zone of the plants
  • Collect 15–20 soil cores (6–8 inches deep) from across the field
  • Growers should focus on areas of the field where plants are showing poor growth and development
  • Mix the cores thoroughly, then place the mixed soil into a resealable plastic bag
  • We need about 2 pints (1 kg) of soil for analysis
  • Keep samples cool — store them in a refrigerator until the field day.
  • If you collect soil samples from different fields, please label and add field information to the plastic bag accordingly
Figure 1. Stunted cotton plants due to a high population density of the reniform nematode. Photo credit: Travis Faske, University of Arkansas
Figure 2: Information for growers to bring soil samples for nematode analysis at the OSU Peanut and Cotton Field Day on September 18th, 2025.
Figure 3: Information for growers to bring soil samples for nematode analysis at the OSU Cotton Field Day on September 25th, 2025.

For Additional Information contact.
Dr. Maíra Duffeck mairodr@okstate.edu

Meet the Aster Leafhopper and Learn How to Distinguish it from the Corn Leafhopper

Ashleigh M. Faris: Extension Cropping Systems Entomologist, IPM Coordinator

Release Date June 3 2025

Last year’s corn stunt disease outbreak, caused by the corn leafhopper transmitting pathogens associated with corn stunt disease, has been on everyone’s minds. Over the past few weeks, I’ve received several calls from growers, crop consultants, and industry partners concerned about leafhoppers in corn. Fortunately, none have been corn leafhoppers, the vast majority have instead been aster leafhoppers. So far, no corn leafhoppers have been reported north of central Texas. Oklahoma did not have any reports of overwintering corn leafhoppers so if we have the insect this year it will need to migrate northward from where it currently resides. For a refresher on the corn leafhopper and corn stunt disease, check out these two previously posted OSU Pest e-Alerts: EPP-25-3and EPP-23-17.

Leafhoppers in general are insects that we have had for many years in our row and field crops. But we likely did not pay attention to them or notice them until this past year due to our heightened awareness of their existence thanks to the corn leafhopper and corn stunt disease. Below is guidance on how to distinguish between the corn leafhopper and aster leafhopper. Remember, if the corn leafhopper is detected in the state, OSU Extension will notify growers, consultants, and industry partners through Pest e-Alerts and our social media channels.

Aster Leafhopper Overview

The aster leafhopper (aka six spotted leafhopper), Macrosteles quadrilineatus, is native to North America and can be found in every U.S. state, as well as Canada. This polyphagous insect feeds on over 300 host plant species including weeds, vegetables, and cereals. Like many other leafhoppers, the aster leafhopper can be a vector of pathogens that cause disease, but corn stunt is not one of them. Instead, aster leafhoppers cause problems in traditional vegetable growing operations, as well as floral production. There is currently no concern for this insect being a vector of disease in row or field crops, including corn. Check out the OSU Pest a-Alert EPP-23-1to learn more about this insect and aster yellows disease.

Aster Leafhopper versus Corn Leafhopper

The corn leafhopper (Photo 1A) and the aster leafhopper, as well as many other leafhopper species have two black dots located between the eyes of the insect (Photo 1). Aster leafhopper adults are 0.125 inches (3 mm) long, with transparent wings that bear strong veins, and darkly colored abdomens (Photo 1B). Their dark abdomen can cause the aster leafhopper to appear grey when you see them in the field. Their long wings can also make the insect appear to have a similar appearance to the corn leafhopper (Dalbulus maidis) (Photo 1).

Characteristics that differentiate the corn leafhopper from the aster leafhopper are as follows. When viewed from above (dorsally): 1) the corn leafhopper’s dots between the eyes have a white halo around them and the aster leafhopper’s dots between eyes lack the white halo and 2) the corn leafhopper has lighter/finer wing veination than the aster leafhopper (Photo 1). When when viewed from their underside (ventrally) 3) the corn leafhopper lacks markings on their face whereas the aster leafhopper has lines/spot on the face and 4) the abdomen of the corn leafhopper lacks the dark coloration of the aster leafhopper (Photo 2).

Photo 1 A & B. Above (dorsal) view of the corn leafhopper (A) and the aster leafhopper (B). A) The corn leafhopper has two black dots between their eyes. These dots are surrounded by light/white “halos”. The corn leafhopper also has light in color wing veins. B) The aster leafhopper also has two black dots between their eyes, however, there is no light coloration surrounding these dots. The aster leafhopper also has dark wing veins, making the veins appear thicker than those of the corn leafhopper.
Photo 2 A & B. Underside (ventral) view of the corn leafhopper (A) and the aster leafhopper (B). A)The corn leafhopper has no markings on the face and their abdomen is lighter in color. B) The aster leafhopper has markings on the face as well as a dark abdomen color.

Confirming Corn Leafhopper Identification

It is important to note that many insects will have their cuticle darken as they age. This, along with there being light and dark morphs of many insects can lend to additional confusion when distinguishing one species from another. If you believe that you have a corn leafhopper then you need to collect the insect and send it to a trained entomologist that can verify the identity of the insect under the microscope. Leafhoppers in general are fast moving insects but they can be collected in an insect net or using a handheld vacuum (see EPP-25-3). You can submit samples to the OSU Plant Disease and Insect Diagnostic Lab.

Please feel free to reach out to OSU Cropping Systems Extension Entomologist Dr. Ashleigh Faris with any questions or concerns. @ ashleigh.faris@okstate.edu